3 responses so far. Updates in real time as auditors respond.
3 responses
| Option | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 2–5 | 2 | 67% |
| 16–50 | 1 | 33% |
| Just me | 0 | 0% |
| 6–15 | 0 | 0% |
| 50+ | 0 | 0% |
3 responses
| Option | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under 100 | 3 | 100% |
| 100–999 | 0 | 0% |
| 1,000–4,999 | 0 | 0% |
| 5,000–19,999 | 0 | 0% |
| 20,000+ | 0 | 0% |
3 responses
| Option | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Spreadsheets & email | 2 | 67% |
| A legacy GRC platform | 1 | 33% |
| Point tools (e.g. ticketing + shared docs) | 0 | 0% |
| A modern GRC platform | 0 | 0% |
| A home-grown / custom-built system | 0 | 0% |
| Nothing formal | 0 | 0% |
3 responses
| Option | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Manual, spreadsheet-based workpapers | 3 | 100% |
| Inadequate audit management / GRC tooling | 2 | 67% |
| Limited access to data / data silos | 1 | 33% |
| Shortage of skilled or experienced audit staff | 0 | 0% |
| Slow stakeholder responses & evidence collection | 0 | 0% |
| Keeping pace with regulatory & risk changes | 0 | 0% |
| Too much time on repetitive testing vs. judgment work | 0 | 0% |
| Budget & headcount constraints | 0 | 0% |
3 responses
| Option | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| AI copilot for evidence review & workpapers | 2 | 67% |
| AI-driven risk scoring & prioritization | 1 | 33% |
| AI-drafted findings & audit narratives | 1 | 33% |
| AI anomaly & fraud detection in transactions | 1 | 33% |
| Auto-mapping controls to frameworks | 1 | 33% |
| Continuous, AI-powered control monitoring | 1 | 33% |
| Integrations with ERP / ITSM / cloud systems | 1 | 33% |
| Natural-language query over audit & risk data | 0 | 0% |
| Predictive risk forecasting | 0 | 0% |
| Human-in-the-loop review before AI conclusions are finalized | 0 | 0% |
| Executive reporting & dashboards | 0 | 0% |
| Stakeholder collaboration & evidence requests | 0 | 0% |
3 responses
| Option | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3 | 100% |
| 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 | 0 | 0% |
3 responses
| Option | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Per named user / seat | 1 | 33% |
| Flat fee per audit team, unlimited users | 1 | 33% |
| Tiered by feature / module | 1 | 33% |
| Usage-based (per audit or per engagement) | 0 | 0% |
| Not sure / depends on the vendor | 0 | 0% |
3 responses
| Option | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Under $5,000 | 3 | 100% |
| $5,000 – $20,000 | 0 | 0% |
| $20,000 – $50,000 | 0 | 0% |
| $50,000 – $150,000 | 0 | 0% |
| $150,000+ | 0 | 0% |
| Not sure | 0 | 0% |